Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer
Home / In General, the Cognitive Abilities of Males and Females Can Be Described as

In General, the Cognitive Abilities of Males and Females Can Be Described as

Post a Comment

Sexual activity differences in cognition are widely studied in the current scientific literature. Biological and genetic differences in combination with surround and civilisation have resulted in the cognitive differences among men and women. Amidst biological factors, hormones such as testosterone and estrogen may play some function mediating these differences. Amongst differences of diverse mental and cognitive abilities, the largest or most well known are those relating to spatial abilities, social cognition and verbal skills and abilities.

Cognitive abilities [edit]

Cognitive abilities are mental abilities that a person uses in everyday life, as well as specific demand tasks. The almost basic of these abilities are memory, executive office, processing speed and perception, which combine to form a larger perceptual umbrella relating to different social, melancholia, verbal and spatial information. Memory, which is one of the primary core of cognitive abilities can exist broken down into short-term memory, working retentivity and long-term retention. There are too other abilities relating to perceptual information such as mental rotation, spatial visualization power, exact fluency and reading comprehension. Other larger perceptual umbrellas include social cognition, empathy, spatial perception and verbal abilities.

Sex differences in memory [edit]

Short term memory [edit]

Diverse researchers have conducted studies to make up one's mind the differences between men and women and their abilities inside their brusk-term memory. For example, a study conducted by Lowe, Mayfield, and Reynolds (2003) examined gender differences amid children and adolescents on various short-term retention measures. This study included 1,279 children and adolescents, 637 males and 642 females, betwixt the ages of 5 and 19. They found that females scored higher on 2 verbal subtests: Word Selective Reminding and Object Recall, and males scored higher on the Memory for Location and Abstract Visual Memory subtests, the key spatial memory tasks. In 2 unlike studies researchers have found that women perform higher on verbal tasks and men perform higher on spatial tasks (Voyer, Voyer, & Saint-Aubin, 2016). These findings are consistent with studies of intelligence with regards to pattern, females performing higher on certain verbal tasks and males performing higher on certain spatial tasks (Voyer, Voyer, & Saint-Aubin, 2016). Same results take been also found cross culturally.[1] Sexual activity differences in verbal brusque-term memory have been found regardless of age even among adults, for case a review published in the journal Neuropsychologia which evaluated studies from 1990 to 2013 found greater female exact memory from ages 11–89 years old.[2] [3]

Working memory [edit]

At that place are usually no sex differences in overall working memory except those involving spatial information such every bit space and object. A 2004 written report published in the journal of Applied Cognitive Psychology establish significantly higher male operation on 4 visuo-spatial working memory.[4] Another 2010 study published in the journal Encephalon and Cognition found a male reward in spatial and object working retention on an northward-back test but not for verbal working memory.[5] Similarly some other study published in the journal Homo Encephalon Mapping found no sexual practice differences in a verbal north-dorsum working retentiveness task among adults from ages 18–58 years quondam.[6] There was too no sexual activity differences in verbal working memory amid a study of academy students published in the Periodical of Dental and Medical Sciences. However, they nevertheless constitute greater male spatial working retentivity in studies published in the journals Encephalon Cognition and Intelligence.[seven] [8] Besides, even though they found no sex activity differences in verbal working memory, researchers have found lower encephalon activity or thermodynamics in the prefrontal cortex of women which suggested greater neural efficiency and less endeavor for the aforementioned functioning.[ix] Researchers signal women might have greater working memory on tasks that only relies on the prefrontal cortex.[ix] However, in another study of working memory, where the goal was to find sex differences nether high loads of working retentiveness, men outperformed women under high loads of working memory. The authors of the report state: "Results indicated sex effects at high loads across tasks and within each chore, such that males had higher accuracy, fifty-fifty amid groups that were matched for performance at lower loads".[ten] A 2006 review and study on working memory published in the periodical European Journal of Cerebral Psychology likewise plant no gender differences in working memory processes except in a double-bridge task where women outperformed men.[xi] There take also been no sex differences found in a popular working memory task known as n-back among a large number of studies.[9] [11] [12] [13] [fourteen]

Long term retentiveness [edit]

Studies accept found a greater female ability in episodic memory involving exact or both exact and visual-spatial tasks while a higher male ability that only involves complex visual-spatial episodic retentivity.[fifteen] [16] For case, a study published in the journal Neuropsychology institute that women perform at a higher level on most verbal episodic tasks and tasks involving some or lilliputian visual-spatial episodic retentiveness.[17] Another study published the following year plant that women perform at a higher level in verbal and not-exact (not-spatial visual) episodic memory but men performed at a higher level in complex visual-spatial episodic retention.[18] A review published in the journal Electric current Directions in Psychological Science by researcher Agneta Herlitz also conclude that college ability in women on episodic-retention tasks requiring both verbal and visuospatial episodic memory and on face-recognition tasks, while men have higher abilities for episodic memory, where visual-spatial skills of high complexity are required.[15]

Sex differences in semantic retentiveness have too been establish with a college female ability which can be explained by a female advantage in verbal fluency.[19] One other study also plant greater female free-call back and long term retrieval amid the ages v–17.[xx]

In another study, when using multiple tests for episodic memory, at that place were no differences betwixt men and women.[21] A similar result was besides found amongst children from 3 to half dozen years erstwhile.[22] As for semantic memory related to general knowledge and knowledge of facts from the globe. That is, in near areas of cognition, men show higher results on semantic retentivity.[23] [24] [25] [26] [27]

Sexual activity differences in executive functions [edit]

In that location has not been enough literature or studies assessing sex departure in executive functioning, specially since executive functions are not a unitary concept. Even so, in the ones that have been done, at that place have been differences establish in attending and inhibition.

Attention [edit]

A 2002 study published in the Journal of Vision found that males were faster at shifting attention from i object to another every bit well as shifting attention within objects.[28] 2012–2014 studies published in the Journal of Neuropsychology with a sample size ranging from 3500 to 9138 participants by researcher Ruben C Gur found higher female person attention accuracy in a neurocognitive battery assessing individuals from ages eight–21.[29] [30] A 2013 written report published in the Chinese Medical Journal found no sex differences in executive and alerting of attention networks simply faster orientation of attending amidst females.[31] A 2010 study published in Neuropsychologia also found greater female responsiveness in attention to processing overall sensory stimulation.[32]

Inhibition and self-regulation [edit]

A 2008 study published in the journal Psychophysiology found faster reaction fourth dimension to deviant stimuli in women.[33] The study also analyzed past literature and found higher female performance in withholding social behavior such equally aggressive responses and improper sexual arousal.[33] Furthermore, they constitute testify that women were ameliorate at resisting temptation in tasks, delaying gratification and controlling emotional expressions.[33] They also found lower female person effort in response inhibition in equal performance for the same tasks implying an advantage for females in response inhibition based on neural efficiency.[33] In another study published in 2011 in the periodical Brain and Noesis, it was found that females outperformed males on the Sustained Attending to Response Task which is a test that measures inhibitory command.[34] Researchers accept hypothesized that any female advantage in inhibition or self-regulation may have evolved equally a response to greater parenting responsibilities in ancestral settings.[33]

Sex differences in processing speed [edit]

Sex differences in processing speed has been largely noted in literature. Studies published in the periodical Intelligence accept found faster processing speed in women. For example, a 2006 study published in Intelligence by researcher Stephen Camarata and Richard Woodcock found faster processing speed in females beyond all age groups in a sample of iv,213 participants.[35] This was followed past another study published in 2008 by researchers Timothy Z Keith and Matthew R. Reynolds who constitute faster processing speed in females from ages 6 to 89 years quondam.[36] The sample also had a number of 8,818 participants.[36] Other studies by Keith accept also found faster processing speed in females from ages 5 to 17.[xx] In one recent study, groups of men and women were tested using the WAIS-IV and WAIS-R tests. According to the research results, at that place were no differences in processing speed between men and women.[37]

Sexual activity differences in semantic perception [edit]

Studies of sex differences in semantic perception (attribution of significant) of words reported that males conceptualize items in terms of concrete or observable attributes whereas females use more evaluative concepts.[38] [39] Another report of young adults in three cultures showed significant sex differences in semantic perception (attribution of meaning) of about common and abstract words. Contrary to mutual behavior, women gave more negative scores to the concepts describing sensational objects, social and concrete attractors merely more positive estimations to work- and reality-related words, in comparison to men [40] This suggests that men favour concepts related to farthermost experience and women favour concepts related to predictable and controllable routines. In a light of the higher rates of awareness seeking and deviancy in males, in comparison to females, these sex differences in meaning attribution were interpreted as back up for the evolutionary theory of sexual practice.[41]

Sexual practice differences in spatial abilities [edit]

Rubik's cube puzzle involving mental rotation

Sex differences in spatial abilities are widely established in literature. Males have much college level of operation in three major spatial tasks which include spatial visualization, spatial perception and mental rotation.[42] [43] Spatial visualization elicits the smallest difference with a deviation of 0.thirteen, perception a deviation of 0.44 and mental rotation the largest with a deviation of 0.73.[42] [44] [45] Another 2013 meta-assay published in the journal Educational Review found greater male person mental rotation in a departure of 0.57 which only grew larger equally fourth dimension limits were added.[46] These male advantages manifests themselves in math and mechanical tasks for instance significantly higher male performance on tests of geometry, measurement, probability, statistics and especially mechanical reasoning.[47] It also manifests and largely mediates college male performance in arithmetic and computational fluency[48] All of these math and technical fields involve spatial abilities such equally rotation and manipulation of imagined space, symbols and objects. Mental rotation has too been linked to college success in fields of engineering, physics and chemistry regardless of gender.[49] Spatial visualization on the other paw likewise correlate with college math accomplishment in a range of 0.30 to 0.60.[50] Furthermore, male advantage in spatial abilities tin can be accounted for by their greater power in spatial working memory.[vii] Sex differences in mental rotation also reaches almost a single difference (i.0) when the tasks require navigation, as found in one written report with participants who used Oculus Rift in a virtual surround.[51]

Even though near spatial abilities are higher in men, object location memory or the power to memorize spatial cues involving categorical relations are higher in women.[2] [52] Simply it depends on the type of stimulus (object) and the task. In some conditions, men's productivity is college (for example, when "male" objects are used), in other atmospheric condition, women's productivity may be higher or there are no differences between the sexes.[52] Higher female power in visual recognition of objects and shapes have also been found.[53] [54]

Sex differences in verbal abilities [edit]

Like spatial ability, sex differences in verbal abilities have been widely established in literature. There is a clear higher female person performance on a number of verbal tasks prominently a higher level of performance in speech production which reaches a departure of 0.33 and as well a higher performance in writing.[43] [44] [55] [56] [57] Studies have as well found greater female performance in phonological processing, identifying alphabetical sequences, and word fluency tasks.[58] [59] [60] Studies have also found that females outperform males in verbal learning especially on tests such every bit Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Examination and Verbal Paired Associates.[61] [62] Information technology has also been found that the hormone estrogen increases ability of speech production and phonological processing in women, which could be tied to their advantages in these areas.[47] Overall improve female performance have besides been found in verbal fluency which include a lilliputian advantage reading comprehension while a significantly college performance in speech product and essay writing.[49] [55] This manifests in higher female international PISA scores in reading and higher female Class 12 scores in national reading, writing and study skills.[63] [64] Researchers Joseph Grand. Andreano and Larry Cahill have also found that the female verbal advantage extends into numerous tasks, including tests of spatial and autobiographical abilities.[xvi]

In a fairly large meta-analysis that analyzed 165 different studies, a very pocket-size difference of 0.11 standard deviations was found. The authors of this written report postulate: "The difference is so small that nosotros argue that gender differences in verbal ability no longer exist."[65]

[edit]

Current literature suggests women have higher level of social noesis. A 2012 review published in the journal Neuropsychologia constitute that women are better at recognizing facial effects, expression processing and emotions in general.[66] Men were only ameliorate at recognizing specific behaviour which includes acrimony, aggression and threatening cues.[66] A 2012 study published in the periodical Neuropsychology with a sample of 3,500 individuals from ages eight–21, found that females outperformed males on face up memory and all social knowledge tests.[29] In 2014, some other study published in the journal Cerebral Cortex found that females had larger activity in the right temporal cortex, an essential core of the social brain connected to perception and understanding the social behaviour of others such as intentions, emotions, and expectations.[67] In 2014, a meta-analysis of 215 study sample by researcher A.E. Johnson and D Voyeur in the journal Cognition and Emotion found overall female person advantage in emotional recognition.[68] Other studies have besides indicated greater female superiority to discriminate vocal and facial expression regardless of valence, and likewise being able to accurately procedure emotional spoken language.[69] Studies take also institute males to exist slower in making social judgments than females.[70] Structural studies with MRI neuroimaging has besides shown that women have bigger regional grey matter volumes in a number of regions related to social information processing including the Junior frontal cortex and bigger cortical folding in the Junior frontal cortex and parietal cortex [70] Researchers suppose that these sex differences in social cognition predisposes males to loftier rates of autism spectrum disorders which is characterized by lower social cognition.[lxx]

A recent study that aimed to place gender differences in social cognition did not show significant differences, with few exceptions. The written report authors state: "The presence of sex differences in social cognition is controversial".[71] Results showed no significant sex differences in affective and cerebral ToM, in the recognition of emotional facial expressions (with the exception of anger: women were more accurate than men), and in the power to place and regulate one'southward ain emotions."[72]

Empathy [edit]

Empathy is a large part of social cognition and facilitates its cognitive components known as theory of mind. Current literature suggests a higher level of empathy in women compared to men.[73] [74] [75]

A 2014 analysis from the journal of Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews reported that there is evidence that "sex differences in empathy accept phylogenetic and ontogenetic roots in biological science and are not just cultural byproducts driven by socialization."[74] Other inquiry has institute no differences in empathy between women and men, and suggest that perceived gender differences are the consequence of motivational differences.[76] [77] [78]

Run into also [edit]

  • Sex differences in humans
  • Sexual practice differences in psychology
  • Sex activity differences in intelligence
  • Sex differences in emotional intelligence
  • Variability hypothesis
  • Emotional intelligence
  • Empathy
  • Spatial ability
  • Mechanical aptitude

References [edit]

  1. ^ Isle of mann VA, Sasanuma S, Sakuma Due north, Masaki S (1990-01-01). "Sex differences in cerebral abilities: a cross-cultural perspective". Neuropsychologia. 28 (10): 1063–77. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(ninety)90141-A. PMID 2267058. S2CID 23833686.
  2. ^ a b Li R (September 2014). "Why women see differently from the way men encounter? A review of sex differences in cognition and sports". Periodical of Sport and Health Science. three (3): 155–162. doi:ten.1016/j.jshs.2014.03.012. PMC4266559. PMID 25520851.
  3. ^ "Sexual activity differences in verbal learning". ResearchGate. doi:x.1002/1097-4679(198811)44:63.0.CO;2-eight (inactive 31 Oct 2021). Retrieved 2016-01-24 . {{cite periodical}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive equally of October 2022 (link)
  4. ^ Bosco A, Longoni AM, Vecchi T (July 2004). "Gender effects in spatial orientation: cognitive profiles and mental strategies". Applied Cerebral Psychology. 18 (v): 519–532. doi:10.1002/acp.k. PMC2909401. PMID 20676381.
  5. ^ Lejbak L, Crossley M, Vrbancic One thousand (June 2011). "A male advantage for spatial and object but not verbal working memory using the due north-back task". Brain and Noesis. 76 (one): 191–6. doi:x.1016/j.bandc.2010.12.002. PMID 21411205. S2CID 205789245.
  6. ^ Schmidt H, Jogia J, Fast Grand, Christodoulou T, Haldane Yard, Kumari 5, Frangou S (Nov 2009). "No gender differences in encephalon activation during the N-back task: an fMRI written report in healthy individuals". Human Brain Mapping. 30 (11): 3609–15. doi:ten.1002/hbm.20783. PMC6870785. PMID 19387979.
  7. ^ a b Kaufman SB (2007). "Sex differences in mental rotation and spatial visualization power: Tin can they be accounted for by differences in working retentiveness chapters?". Intelligence. 35 (iii): 211–223. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2006.07.009.
  8. ^ Duff SJ, Hampson Eastward (December 2001). "A sexual practice difference on a novel spatial working retentivity task in humans". Encephalon and Cognition. 47 (3): 470–93. doi:10.1006/brcg.2001.1326. PMID 11748902. S2CID 41875374.
  9. ^ a b c Li T, Luo Q, Gong H (May 2010). "Gender-specific hemodynamics in prefrontal cortex during a verbal working memory task by about-infrared spectroscopy". Behavioural Brain Inquiry. 209 (1): 148–53. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2010.01.033. PMID 20117145. S2CID 2454243.
  10. ^ Reed, Jessica L.; Gallagher, Natalie M.; Sullivan, Marie; Callicott, Joseph H.; Greenish, Adam East. (2017-04-01). "Sex differences in verbal working memory functioning sally at very high loads of common neuroimaging tasks". Encephalon and Knowledge. 113: 56–64. doi:x.1016/j.bandc.2017.01.001. ISSN 0278-2626. PMID 28119206. S2CID 2337056.
  11. ^ a b Robert M, Savoie Northward (2006). "Are there gender differences in exact and visuospatial working-memory resources?". European Periodical of Cognitive Psychology. 18 (3): 378–397. doi:ten.1080/09541440500234104. S2CID 144420975.
  12. ^ "N -back task to assess sex deviation in working memory: A pilot study". ResearchGate . Retrieved 2016-02-02 .
  13. ^ Harness A, Jacot 50, Scherf Southward, White A, Warnick JE (August 2008). "Sex differences in working retention". Psychological Reports. 103 (i): 214–8. doi:ten.2466/PR0.103.five.214-218. PMID 18982954.
  14. ^ Goldstein JM, Jerram G, Poldrack R, Anagnoson R, Breiter HC, Makris Northward, et al. (July 2005). "Sex differences in prefrontal cortical brain action during fMRI of auditory exact working memory". Neuropsychology. 19 (4): 509–19. doi:x.1037/0894-4105.19.4.509. PMID 16060826. S2CID 16100987.
  15. ^ a b Herlitz A, Rehnman J (2008). "Sexual practice Differences in Episodic Memory". Current Directions in Psychological Science. 17 (1): 52–56. doi:x.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00547.x. S2CID 145107751.
  16. ^ a b Andreano JM, Cahill Fifty (April 2009). "Sex influences on the neurobiology of learning and memory". Learning & Memory. 16 (4): 248–66. doi:x.1101/lm.918309. PMID 19318467.
  17. ^ Herlitz A, Airaksinen E, Nordström E (October 1999). "Sex activity differences in episodic retentiveness: the touch on of verbal and visuospatial ability". Neuropsychology. 13 (iv): 590–seven. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.xiii.4.590. PMID 10527068.
  18. ^ Lewin C, Wolgers G, Herlitz A (Apr 2001). "Sex differences favoring women in verbal but not in visuospatial episodic retentivity". Neuropsychology. 15 (2): 165–73. doi:ten.1037/0894-4105.15.2.165. PMID 11324860.
  19. ^ Maitland SB, Herlitz A, Nyberg L, Bäckman L, Nilsson LG (October 2004). "Selective sex differences in declarative retentivity". Memory & Knowledge. 32 (7): 1160–9. doi:10.3758/BF03196889. PMID 15813497. S2CID 39106894.
  20. ^ a b Keith TZ, Reynolds MR, Roberts LG, Winter AL, Austin CA (2011). "Sex differences in latent cerebral abilities ages 5 to 17: Testify from the Differential Ability Scales—Second Edition". Intelligence. 39 (five): 389–404. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2011.06.008.
  21. ^ Cheke, Lucy One thousand.; Clayton, Nicola South. (2013-09-01). "Do unlike tests of episodic retention produce consistent results in human adults?". Learning & Memory. twenty (9): 491–498. doi:10.1101/lm.030502.113. ISSN 1072-0502. PMID 23955172.
  22. ^ Cheke, Lucy G.; Clayton, Nicola S. (September 2015). "The six blind men and the elephant: Are episodic memory tasks tests of different things or different tests of the same affair?". Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 137: 164–171. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2015.03.006. ISSN 0022-0965. PMC4454356. PMID 25931424.
  23. ^ Lynn, Richard; Irwing, Paul (November 2002). "Sex differences in full general cognition, semantic memory and reasoning power". British Journal of Psychology. 93 (Pt four): 545–556. doi:10.1348/000712602761381394. ISSN 0007-1269. PMID 12519533.
  24. ^ Lynn, Richard; Ivanec, Dragutin; Zarevski, Predrag (June 2009). "Sexual activity differences in general knowledge domains". Collegium Antropologicum. 33 (2): 515–520. ISSN 0350-6134. PMID 19662772.
  25. ^ Lynn, Richard; Irwing, Paul; Cammock, Thomas (2001-01-01). "Sex differences in full general cognition". Intelligence. 30 (1): 27–39. doi:x.1016/S0160-2896(01)00064-2. ISSN 0160-2896.
  26. ^ Lynn, Richard; Wilberg-Neidhardt, Sylwia; Margraf-Stiksrud, Jutta (2005-12-01). "Sex activity differences in general cognition in High german and Northern Irish university students". Sexualities, Evolution & Gender. vii (3): 277–285. doi:10.1080/14616660500477755. ISSN 1479-2508.
  27. ^ Tran, Ulrich S.; Hofer, Agnes A.; Voracek, Martin (2014). "Sex differences in full general cognition: meta-analysis and new information on the contribution of school-related moderators amongst high-school students". PLOS ONE. 9 (10): e110391. Bibcode:2014PLoSO...9k0391T. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0110391. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC4210204. PMID 25347190.
  28. ^ Dark-brown JM, Breitmeyer BG, Hand J, Browning F (2010). "JOV | Sex differences in shifting attention within and between objects". Journal of Vision. 2 (7): 13. doi:10.1167/two.7.13.
  29. ^ a b Gur RC, Richard J, Calkins ME, Chiavacci R, Hansen JA, Bilker WB, et al. (March 2012). "Age group and sex differences in performance on a computerized neurocognitive battery in children age 8-21". Neuropsychology. 26 (2): 251–265. doi:10.1037/a0026712. PMC3295891. PMID 22251308.
  30. ^ Roalf DR, Gur RE, Ruparel Grand, Calkins ME, Satterthwaite TD, Bilker WB, et al. (July 2014). "Within-individual variability in neurocognitive functioning: historic period- and sex-related differences in children and youths from ages 8 to 21". Neuropsychology. 28 (4): 506–xviii. doi:ten.1037/neu0000067. PMC4175525. PMID 24773417.
  31. ^ Liu M, Hu PP, Fan J, Wang 1000 (June 2013). "Gender differences associated with orienting attentional networks in good for you subjects". Chinese Medical Journal. 126 (12): 2308–12. PMID 23786944.
  32. ^ Popovich C, Dockstader C, Cheyne D, Tannock R (December 2010). "Sex differences in sensorimotor mu rhythms during selective attentional processing". Neuropsychologia. 48 (14): 4102–ten. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.x.016. hdl:1807/24276. PMID 20951711. S2CID 37024633.
  33. ^ a b c d eastward Yuan J, He Y, Qinglin Z, Chen A, Li H (November 2008). "Gender differences in behavioral inhibitory command: ERP evidence from a 2-option oddball task". Psychophysiology. 45 (6): 986–93. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00693.x. PMID 18778319.
  34. ^ Hansen S (August 2011). "Inhibitory control and empathy-related personality traits: sex-linked associations". Brain and Cognition. 76 (iii): 364–8. doi:x.1016/j.bandc.2011.04.004. PMID 21570758. S2CID 12273654.
  35. ^ Camarata South, Woodcock R (2006). "Sex differences in processing speed: Developmental effects in males and females". Intelligence. 34 (iii): 231–252. doi:ten.1016/j.intell.2005.12.001.
  36. ^ a b Keith TZ, Reynolds MR, Patel PG, Ridley KP (2008). "Sex differences in latent cognitive abilities ages 6 to 59: Evidence from the Woodcock–Johnson III tests of cognitive abilities". Intelligence. 36 (6): 502–525. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2007.xi.001.
  37. ^ Pezzuti L, Tommasi M, Saggino A, Dawe J, Lauriola M (2020-03-01). "Gender differences and measurement bias in the assessment of adult intelligence: Evidence from the Italian WAIS-Four and WAIS-R standardizations". Intelligence. 79: 101436. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2020.101436. ISSN 0160-2896. S2CID 216211948.
  38. ^ Haas A (1979). "Male and female spoken linguistic communication difficulties: stereotypes and evidence". Psychological Message. 86 (3): 616–626. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.616. S2CID 16973813.
  39. ^ Poole ME (1982). "Social class-sex contrasts in patterns of cognitive mode: a cross-cultural replication". Psychological Reports. 50: 19–26. doi:ten.2466/pr0.1982.50.one.19. S2CID 143679219.
  40. ^ Trofimova I (November 2013). "Understanding misunderstanding: a study of sex differences in meaning attribution". Psychological Enquiry. 77 (6): 748–threescore. doi:10.1007/s00426-012-0462-eight. PMID 23179581. S2CID 4828135.
  41. ^ Trofimova I (2015). "Do Psychological Sex Differences Reverberate Evolutionary Bisexual Segmentation?". The American Journal of Psychology. 128 (4): 485–514. doi:ten.5406/amerjpsyc.128.iv.0485. JSTOR 10.5406/amerjpsyc.128.4.0485. PMID 26721176. S2CID 4831736.
  42. ^ a b Linn MC, Petersen AC (December 1985). "Emergence and label of sexual activity differences in spatial power: a meta-assay". Kid Development. 56 (6): 1479–98. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1985.tb00213.10. PMID 4075870.
  43. ^ a b Weiss EM, Kemmler G, Deisenhammer EA, Fleischhacker WW, Delazer M (2003). "Sexual practice differences in cognitive functions". Personality and Private Differences. 35 (4): 863–875. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00288-X. Retrieved 2016-02-01 .
  44. ^ a b Maclntyre T (1997). "Gender differences in cognition: A minefield of enquiry issues". The Irish Journal of Psychology. 18 (iv): 386–396. doi:10.1080/03033910.1997.1010558158.
  45. ^ Donnon T, DesCôteaux JG, Violato C (October 2005). "Impact of cerebral imaging and sex differences on the evolution of laparoscopic suturing skills". Canadian Periodical of Surgery. Periodical Canadien de Chirurgie. 48 (5): 387–93. PMC3211902. PMID 16248138.
  46. ^ Maeda Y, Yoon South (2012-12-09). "A Meta-Analysis on Gender Differences in Mental Rotation Ability Measured by the Purdue Spatial Visualization Tests: Visualization of Rotations (PSVT:R)". Educational Psychology Review. 25 (1): 69–94. doi:x.1007/s10648-012-9215-x. ISSN 1040-726X. S2CID 143641936.
  47. ^ a b Wizemann TM, Pardue ML, et al. (Constitute of Medicine (U.s.) Committee on Agreement the Biology of Sexual activity and Gender) (2001-01-01). "Sex Affects Behavior and Perception". National Academies Printing (U.s.).
  48. ^ Geary DC, Saults SJ, Liu F, Hoard MK (Dec 2000). "Sex activity differences in spatial cognition, computational fluency, and arithmetical reasoning". Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 77 (4): 337–53. CiteSeerX10.i.1.413.1464. doi:10.1006/jecp.2000.2594. PMID 11063633.
  49. ^ a b Hyde JS, et al. (Committee on Maximizing the Potential of Women in Bookish Science and Engineering science) (2006-01-01). "Women in Science and Mathematics". National Academies Printing (Us).
  50. ^ van Garderen D (2006-12-01). "Spatial visualization, visual imagery, and mathematical problem solving of students with varying abilities". Journal of Learning Disabilities. 39 (six): 496–506. doi:10.1177/00222194060390060201. PMID 17165617.
  51. ^ Foroughi CK, Wren WC, Barragán D, Mead PR, Boehm-Davis DA (2016). "Assessing Mental Rotation Ability in a Virtual Environment with an Oculus Rift". Proceedings of the Man Factors and Ergonomics Society Almanac Meeting. 59 (1): 1849–1852. doi:ten.1177/1541931215591399. S2CID 147973407.
  52. ^ a b Voyer, Daniel; Postma, Albert; Brake, Brandy; Imperato-McGinley, Julianne (2007-02-01). "Gender differences in object location retentivity: A meta-analysis". Psychonomic Message & Review. 14 (one): 23–38. doi:10.3758/BF03194024. ISSN 1531-5320. PMID 17546728. S2CID 44658445.
  53. ^ McGivern RF, Mutter KL, Anderson J, Wideman G, Bodnar M, Huston PJ (1998). "Gender differences in incidental learning and visual recognition memory: Support for a sex deviation in unconscious environmental awareness". Personality and Individual Differences. 25 (ii): 223–232. doi:ten.1016/S0191-8869(98)00017-viii. Retrieved 2016-01-07 .
  54. ^ McGivern RF, Huston JP, Byrd D, King T, Siegle GJ, Reilly J (August 1997). "Sex differences in visual recognition memory: support for a sex-related departure in attending in adults and children". Brain and Cognition. 34 (3): 323–36. doi:ten.1006/brcg.1997.0872. PMID 9292185. S2CID 2411374.
  55. ^ a b Reynolds MR, Scheiber C, Hajovsky DB, Schwartz B, Kaufman Every bit (2015-08-01). "Gender Differences in Bookish Achievement: Is Writing an Exception to the Gender Similarities Hypothesis?". The Journal of Genetic Psychology. 176 (iii–4): 211–34. doi:10.1080/00221325.2015.1036833. PMID 26135387. S2CID 609098.
  56. ^ Olson RK, Hulslander J, Christopher M, Keenan JM, Wadsworth SJ, Willcutt EG, et al. (April 2013). "Genetic and environmental influences on writing and their relations to language and reading". Annals of Dyslexia. 63 (ane): 25–43. doi:10.1007/s11881-011-0055-z. PMC3218215. PMID 21842316.
  57. ^ Scheiber C, Reynolds MR, Hajovsky DB, Kaufman Every bit (2015). "Gender Differences in Achievement in a Large, Nationally Representative Sample of Children and Adolescents". Psychology in the Schools. 52 (4): 335–348. doi:x.1002/pits.21827.
  58. ^ Majeres RL (December 1997). "Sex differences in phonetic processing: speed of identification of alphabetical sequences". Perceptual and Motor Skills. 85 (three Pt 2): 1243–51. doi:x.2466/pms.1997.85.3f.1243. PMID 9450277. S2CID 21126047.
  59. ^ Majeres RL (March 1999). "Sex activity differences in phonological processes: speeded matching and word reading". Retentivity & Noesis. 27 (2): 246–53. doi:10.3758/bf03211409. PMID 10226435. S2CID 40556596.
  60. ^ Hirnstein M, Coloma Andrews L, Hausmann M (November 2014). "Gender-stereotyping and cognitive sex differences in mixed- and same-sexual practice groups". Archives of Sexual Behavior. 43 (viii): 1663–73. doi:10.1007/s10508-014-0311-5. PMC4198804. PMID 24923876.
  61. ^ Basso MR, Harrington K, Matson M, Lowery North (May 2000). "Sexual activity differences on the WMS-III: findings concerning exact paired associates and faces". The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 14 (2): 231–5. doi:ten.1076/1385-4046(200005)14:2;ane-Z;FT231. PMID 10916198. S2CID 43496075.
  62. ^ Gale SD, Baxter 50, Connor DJ, Herring A, Comer J (July 2007). "Sex differences on the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test and the Cursory Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised in the elderly: normative information in 172 participants". Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 29 (v): 561–7. doi:10.1080/13803390600864760. PMID 17564921. S2CID 39966895.
  63. ^ Stoet K, Geary DC (2013-03-xiii). "Sex differences in mathematics and reading accomplishment are inversely related: within- and beyond-nation assessment of 10 years of PISA data". PLOS ONE. viii (3): e57988. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...857988S. doi:x.1371/journal.pone.0057988. PMC3596327. PMID 23516422.
  64. ^ Part of Research and Development (1998). Sat® and Gender Differences (PDF). Research.Collegeboard. College Board.
  65. ^ Hyde J, Linn Thou (1988). "Gender differences in exact ability: A meta-analysis". Psychological Bulletin. 104: 53–69. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.104.ane.53. S2CID 144667163.
  66. ^ a b Kret ME, De Gelder B (June 2012). "A review on sex differences in processing emotional signals". Neuropsychologia. 50 (7): 1211–21. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.12.022. PMID 22245006. S2CID 11695245.
  67. ^ Pavlova MA, Sokolov AN, Bidet-Ildei C (October 2015). "Sexual practice Differences in the Neuromagnetic Cortical Response to Biological Motion". Cerebral Cortex. 25 (10): 3468–74. doi:ten.1093/cercor/bhu175. PMID 25100856.
  68. ^ Thompson AE, Voyer D (2014-01-01). "Sex activity differences in the ability to recognise non-exact displays of emotion: a meta-analysis". Noesis & Emotion. 28 (7): 1164–95. doi:ten.1080/02699931.2013.875889. PMID 24400860. S2CID 5402395.
  69. ^ Schirmer A, Zysset Due south, Kotz SA, Yves von Cramon D (March 2004). "Gender differences in the activation of inferior frontal cortex during emotional speech perception". NeuroImage. 21 (3): 1114–23. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.x.048. PMID 15006679. S2CID 7152876.
  70. ^ a b c Hall J, Philip RC, Marwick K, Whalley HC, Romaniuk L, McIntosh AM, et al. (2012-12-26). "Social cognition, the male encephalon and the autism spectrum". PLOS Ane. seven (12): e49033. Bibcode:2012PLoSO...749033H. doi:ten.1371/journal.pone.0049033. PMC3530576. PMID 23300517.
  71. ^ Di Tella, Marialaura; Miti, Francesca; Ardito, Rita B.; Adenzato, Mauro (2020-08-01). "Social cognition and sex: Are men and women actually different?". Personality and Private Differences. 162: 110045. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110045. ISSN 0191-8869. S2CID 218796635.
  72. ^ Di Tella M, Miti F, Ardito RB, Adenzato G (2020-08-01). "Social cognition and sex: Are men and women really unlike?". Personality and Individual Differences. 162: 110045. doi:x.1016/j.paid.2020.110045. S2CID 218796635.
  73. ^ Joseph DL, Newman DA (January 2010). "Emotional intelligence: an integrative meta-analysis and cascading model". The Journal of Applied Psychology. 95 (1): 54–78. doi:10.1037/a0017286. PMID 20085406.
  74. ^ a b Christov-Moore Fifty, Simpson EA, Coudé M, Grigaityte Thou, Iacoboni One thousand, Ferrari PF (October 2014). "Empathy: gender furnishings in brain and behavior". Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 46 (Pt 4): 604–27. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.001. PMC5110041. PMID 25236781.
  75. ^ Hertenstein MJ, Keltner D (January 2011). "Gender and the Advice of Emotion Via Touch". Sex activity Roles. 64 (one–ii): 70–fourscore. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9842-y. PMC3016097. PMID 21297854.
  76. ^ Ickes, William; Gesn, Paul L.; Graham, Tiffany (20 May 2005). "Gender differences in empathic accuracy: Differential power or differential motivation?". Personal Relationships. seven (1): 94–109. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2000.tb00006.x.
  77. ^ Ickles, William (15 January 1997). Empathic Accuracy. New York: The Guilford Press. p. 140. ISBN1572301619.
  78. ^ Klein, K. J. K.; Hodges, S. D. (2001). "Gender Differences, Motivation, and Empathic Accuracy: When it Pays to Sympathize". Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 27 (half dozen): 720–730. doi:x.1177/0146167201276007. S2CID 14361887.

gauthierstrater.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_differences_in_cognition

Post a Comment for "In General, the Cognitive Abilities of Males and Females Can Be Described as"